Tuesday, August 25, 2015

...former Americans against the Democrat(ic) Party...

I've been spending a lot of time on social media of late. Go ahead and shoot me, but I like opinion articles. I follow a lot of Facebook pages and Twitter accounts (Instagram I save for fun)...I do appreciate all viewpoints, even from (what I consider) evil pages like Occupy Democrat (yes, I don't know why a progressive, no, an anti-conservative site would leave out the "ic" as in Democrat-ic) and I also like just plain partisan pages like the Huffington Post and Breitbart.com...one thing for sure though...there are A LOT of whack-os out there...


Speaking of the Occupy Democrat(ic) page...they hate it when you call them the Democrat Party, so I'm just trying to be respectful here...but speaking of the OD page, pick a topic, any topic and OD will find a way to blame a Republican (no problem), a Conservative (at times), or all who aren't OD (hold on there, Arlo)...I've noticed it often, but more predominately from the left, that there are a bunch of  "anti" or "against" pages on the Internet...therefore...


I am going to start my own Facebook page, entitled "Former Americans against the Democrat(ic) Party." Well, when I get around to it, that is...at any rate, since we like being against people, places, or things, I thought I'd jump into the mix...sort of like I did with football teams...for instance, the Oakland Raiders...a loyal fan base, to say the least. The majority of Oakland/LA Raiders' fans love to hate other teams (especially the 49ers, the Broncos, and the Chiefs) almost to the point it appears they care less about their own team's success than the fate of their "enemies."


After attending a 49ers-Raiders' game (AT the old Candlestick Park, home of the 49ers) and being seated among at least a dozen Raiders' fans for every 49ers' fan, I witnessed first hand what needed to be done. Raiders' fans were abusive to the extreme and despite it only being a preseason game, they continued berating everyone within earshot, almost ignoring the action on the field (they were winning, by the way), only cheering when a 49ers' player was injured and carried off the field. I thereafter decided to become an anti-Raiders' fan...and would "root for whichever" team was facing the Raiders that particular week.


Many were amused, more were bewildered, and some were (even) outraged that I wasn't a "fan of ANY football team," and chose to spread my allegiances in such a manner. I shrugged my shoulders and thought, "oh well, I've never really been a fan of any particular team anyway, so..." However, seeing the reaction for something as pedestrian (and meaningless in the long term) as football, it appears to be an appropriate mind set to take toward what has (now) become an ideological war (a political football, if you will) in our country today.


So, that's it...I guess it's time to "fight fire with fire." I've always treated this blog with a humorous, quasi-neutral approach to politics, opting not to follow or endorse any candidate or Party. No, not even Donald Trump, a post for another day, but a clear indication the country is sick of the bifurcated nature of politics today, ESPECIALLY in the last 15 or so years. So, "Former Americans against the Democrat(ic) Party," it is...why former, you ask? Well, as I've stated clearly in previous posts, I believe we are past the "point of no return," and the Democrat(ic)s may have already bought the farm. I just hope they understand the harvest doesn't come in the mail each month...

Thursday, August 13, 2015

Maybe I AM the problem...

I've been away for several weeks...busy moving...and yes, 2015 marks the first time in years I will not be a resident of the State of California. I know, I know, I wimped out and took the "Gray Train," to Nevada last year...and now, bought a house here (I like to call it Hooterville) and finished moving from our rental a couple of days ago. No, I haven't stayed away from the news in our country, even the happenings in California...heck, I still have family in CA.


However, the news of  the skinny white punk who entered a well known black church in Charleston, SC, and shot/killed 9 worshippers for no reason other than racial animus and hatred, well, it's almost too much to bear. Pundits on both sides immediately pounced...even the President of the United States. The only people not treating the tragedy as an opportunity seemed to be the people of Charleston and the families of the victims themselves. While the president was busy fundraising and calling for "us to do something about gun violence," others were spouting the mental health angle, and still others we're wondering (aloud, mind you) why black youths who commit crime are called "thugs," while white criminals are called "disturbed." Really?


But why am I the problem, you ask? Well, as I observed the country tumbling into a sort of divisive abyss, I felt there was nothing left for me except to simply get out...or get out of the way. Especially in California, if you're not a left-leaning liberal Democrat, or a political/professional elite (you know, actor, athlete, artist, or activist) well, you're really not welcome. What good could I do, I thought? Nobody wanted to work together, certainly not our leaders, NONE of them...


I even contemplated moving to Mexico, but aside from the fact that they don't really want Yanks there either, it wouldn't have made sense to continue paying US taxes while living in another country. Plus, I don't feel that the direction the country is headed warrants such a drastic action. Hey, I'm more Libertarian than anything, so if a collectivist, re-distributive, bloated government is what the people want, I'll make it work for me and my family...I hope. Still, even though I've kept writing my blog and waiting for the proper moment to jump back into the fold, I can't help but feel that I've abandoned my country.


So, how can I help? That's all I ever wanted to do...it's why I chose the line of work I did for 26-plus years. But, how exactly can I help? I'd be pleased as punch to hear from any (either) of my readers with suggestions. Seriously, watching and monitoring the media and calling them out from time to time does not seem to be catching on...it's almost like you "have to" pick a side to be taken seriously, seriously...


...I DON'T WANT TO BE A FOX NEWS BUTT BOY...but quite frankly, they're probably the only media organization that would have me (well, until the "butt boy" comment)...because nobody in the quote-unquote mainstream media wants any kind of oversight, that's for sure...and the left wing media, well, I'd rather slit my wrists (hey, put away that switchblade!). Most of all though, I'm getting tired of inserting my (warranted) perspective into all these tragic stories...when it seems that most others don't give a rat's ass...but yeah, I'm the problem...right...








Sunday, August 2, 2015

Do Blue Lives Matter?

A lot of talk recently about how Black Lives Matter and the recent rash of officer involved shootings, several resulting in the deaths of innocent black lives at the hands (or firearms) of white police officers. Criminal offenses, yes...especially in South Carolina and more recently at the University of Cincinnati...the black community is angry and rightfully so...whether these recent shootings are becoming more frequent (as I believe) or receiving additional scrutiny from our glorious media is beside the point. Something has to be done...


We've heard a lot of talk about body cameras (a good idea) and additional training (of course) as well as further oversight by the US Department of Justice (certainly)...all these have been utilized to a certain extent and most would agree the problem is getting worse. As always, MediaCopp has the answer...just as I did with the housing bubble (and burst) and the Wall Street banking debacle. Yes, my suggestions were ignored or implemented too late to actually provide necessary assistance.


What's the answer? Well, as drastic as it sounds, it is the only thing that will work in the short term. During recent discussions, I've found that...not too many people like my "eventually" solutions. So, here it goes...what we need to do...is enact a law where you can not be a police officer if you are a white male...simple as that...I've always believed we needed to diversify our law enforcement ranks, however now I see that's not enough. I believe we need, at the very least, all positions (especially of higher authority but also at the street level) in police agencies be made up exclusively of minority individuals, be they black, Hispanic or even Asian. Sorry, white immigrants from eastern bloc countries or elsewhere, I realize it's not your fault, but a line has to be drawn somewhere...


Discriminatory, you say? No, white males can still be in support positions...NO ONE need lose their job...and of course, white females can still hold front line positions. But in the United States today, appearances matter...almost more than integrity...and if it takes the grandiose gesture of eliminating all white male cops from the streets to demonstrate we are serious about unwarranted police violence against unarmed black males, I say we need to try it.


Many believe stricter gun control and possibly disarming (most) police officers as done in the United Kingdom are the way to go...a quality idea for sure, however neither...or even both together...would have the needed immediate effect than simply removing the problem (white male cops) from the streets. Another group of naysayers complain that this will not solve the problem because the current group (blacks, Hispanics, Asians) would soon align accordingly much as our society (almost) demands today. But I say "blue" is stronger than race...especially if it's not watered down with the "old boys network."


So, yes, Black Lives Matter...and certainly, blue lives matter...and this is the best way to make sure both equally matter...as they should...






Monday, June 29, 2015

What a week!

Wow...what a week...nothing else to say, but wow...however, as you know, there IS more to say:


     * With Greece hours away from defaulting on a $1.8 Billion loan from IMF, noted NY Times columnist Paul Krugman is scrambling to show how he is still right after all...


     * With the newest growing demographic in the US now being those able to work, but no longer looking (or even interested), one may not have to go to Europe to experience the same bliss...


     * With all the SCOTUS headlines this past week, the administration (with an assist from the clueless GOP) rams through the TPP (no, that doesn't stand for Toilet Paper Party)...


     * With the recent tragedy in Charleston, SC fresh in our minds, a growing faction has decided the Confederate flag is, or should be taboo...


     * With some reservation, I must at least this once agree with comedian Sarah Silverman that it's a good idea NOT to outlaw this flag because it makes identifying the racists among us much easier...


     * With our new "non-worker" demographic emerging, perhaps it might be best to, this time, listen to the Democrats with regard to assimilating these folks into the general (responsible) population...


     * With the new "collective" and "redistributive" direction our country appears headed, I think the old adage, "there is no free lunch," should be abandoned and discarded...


     * With the recent SCOTUS schedule fresh in our thoughts, is there anyone besides me who thinks Chief Justice John Roberts might possibly be suffering from a sort of multiple personality disorder?


     * With gay marriage now constitutionally protected (yes, it's about time) in all 50 states, does that also mean a concealed weapon permit issued in one state is now effective the other states as well...


     * With the ACA now firmly entrenched (always has been in my opinion) and subsidies are good nationwide, does that also mean no interstate restrictions when it comes to purchasing insurance?

Thursday, May 21, 2015

The Final Top 10

Last night, CBS aired the final Late Show with David Letterman...a bittersweet moment for sure as many of us remember fondly the Late Show as well as NBC's Late Night with David Letterman and before that, the short lived, ill-fated David Letterman (morning) show also on NBC. I was a huge fan, less so now...not so much because of his obvious left leaning political bent of late, but because he strayed from the path of comedy for what appeared to be a quote-unquote, message.


When he started in late night back on February 1, 1982, I wrote a review for my college newspaper and admitted my bias, but I also carefully documented what I believed were attributes Letterman possessed which would propel him to stardom...and ultimately what late night television might hold for this weird former TV weatherman from Indiana. I was well aware of Letterman from the stand-up circuit and (even) his brief stint as a regular on the summer replacement series, the Mary Tyler Moore Variety Show earlier that decade.


Letterman's message toward the end, I believe, was that he believed the world was unfair and by golly, he was going to expose those he felt responsible. Many, including Letterman himself, say he was a victim of the internet age and had an inability to "connect with the kids," as Jimmy Fallon and to a lesser extent Jimmy Kimmel have excelled. Even the recently retired Jon Stewart as well as Stephen Colbert (Letterman's replacement scheduled to take over later this year) were able to form a strong bond with the audience which had eluded Letterman. But no, technology never slowed Johnny Carson.


There were also some who believed Letterman became so bitter after losing Carson's Tonight Show to Jay Leno that he went the curmudgeon route as a defense mechanism...again, not so...Letterman remained brilliant for years, even when he was routinely losing in the ratings to the more popular, Leno. No, it appeared Letterman soon became more concerned with pleasing the social and political elite in this country, often the very same people he used to mock in his former NBC (Late Night) show.


Many of Letterman's routines, while closely resembling bits aired earlier on Your Show of Shows with Sid Caesar or the original Tonight Show with Steve Allen, became cult classics. Although oft-times straying from straight comedy to more "message-oriented" humor, many of these routines remained strong through the end. Obviously the most popular was the Top 10 list...a bit that allowed Letterman to simultaneously get laughs AND promote his message. As a tribute...the Top 10 things I noticed about the Letterman finale...


#10...not to worry, Dave, unless Colbert takes his buffoonish O'Reilly character with him, your legacy is secure...


 #9...you led off the show with a string a presidents, your "all-star" Top 10 had some big names, your wife and son even appeared, but the "studio audience was devoid of special guests...


 #8...I understand being a liberal, you can surround yourself with other like minded (uh, white) folks without incurring media scrutiny (see Jon Stewart), but still...


 #7...they say your finale had the "biggest audience for a Late Show" since 1994...what happened between then and now...


 #6...the "World's Most Dangerous Band," and their leader Paul Shaffer, although they received a brief mention or two, deserved a much more featured role in the finale...


 #5...well, Dave, as Terry Bradshaw might say to Frank Caliendo doing an impression of you, "not funny, Dave, not funny."


 #4...very, very happy to see Biff Henderson...


 #3...where was Chris Elliott?


 #2...really? Foo Fighters? Well, since they cancelled a tour once to appear on your show...


and the #1 thing I noticed about the Letterman finale...


I wasn't on it...bummer...thanks for the laughs Dave...

Thursday, May 14, 2015

This conspiracy is, well, less vast...

The big news this week is Deflategate, the Clintonesque scandal involving underinflated footballs used by the New England Patriots in last year's AFC Championship game against the Indianapolis Colts. The sports media has quickly taken sides, the majority calling it another skirting of the rules and embarrassment to the game with a vocal minority quickly rising to the defense of the Patriots and much maligned Quarterback Tom Brady and Head Coach Bill Belichick. The sides are predictable much like those of both the pro and anti-Clinton contingencies.


This certainly isn't the first time the Patriots have gained an advantage from defiance of "loose rules" or even an out-and-out violation of actual rules of the game. A "loose rule" actually propelled the Patriots to their first Super Bowl victory, Super Bowl XXXVI on February 3, 2002...the infamous "Tuck" rule allowed the Patriots to beat the Oakland Raiders in that season's AFC Divisional Game when Raiders' cornerback Charles Woodson sacked Brady, causing him to fumble. The fumble was recovered by Raiders' linebacker Greg Biekert; however, officials reviewed the play and changed the call to an incomplete pass, thus surely changing the game's outcome.


The Patriots had already been engaging in ignorance of or (even) defiance of rules as early as 2000, more specifically the Spygate controversy, whereby they would videotape (steal) other teams' signals giving their own players clear advantages during games. Although documented cases of these infractions date back more than several years, the Patriots weren't actually caught until the 2007 season and penalized prior to the 2008 season (fine and loss of draft choice). It is further noted the Patriots last won a Super Bowl in 2005, a possible motive for their involvement in the current controversy and subsequent victory in Super Bowl XLIX earlier this year.


The parallels between "Deflategate" and (your choice of) Clinton controversy are striking. Both are clearly scandalous and contain aspects of cover-up. Both involve a basic lack of respect for others and a slap in the face of tradition. Although "Deflategate" didn't involve violation of the law, even if the Patriots broke the law, it feels as if the media would give them a pass anyway. If nothing else, the media has been able to easily change the narrative (much like any Clinton scandal). For instance, the clear engagement in systematic cheating (playing with underinflated footballs) has been altered through media manipulation to "11 of 12 footballs measured in the second half of the Patriots-Colts AFC Championship game were underinflated."


We went from a clear pattern of cheating (Tuckgate, Spygate, Deflategate) to "11 or 12 footballs in the second half of one game"...much the same as Monicagate, Benghazi, or something as nefarious as "selling nuclear secrets to the Chinese," becoming simply "the GOP attacking the good work of the Clinton Foundation." No one but the media (and kudos to the sports media) could minimize a pattern of bad behavior, even lawlessness, and turn it into a simple annoyance. Still, if I'm Brady, I go ahead and delete all those texts and phone calls...

Sunday, April 26, 2015

Do you really want the answer?

Recently, there has been much talk of police brutality, and the notion that police agencies are targeting young black men and other people of color. There is anger on both sides of the issue, one side maintaining the majority of officers are racist and out to deny the civil rights of all citizens, but more so on the poor and minority...and the other side claims officer involved incidents, those where a person of color is victimized, are relatively rare. I believe it's somewhere in the middle.


Are these incidents indicative of a systemic problem within the entire judicial system? An argument could be made for this position...sentencing laws are still biased against the poor and minority...even before they appear in a Court of law, they are far more likely to encounter law enforcement. Once in a Court of law, these "offenders" are also more likely to be denied reasonable bail or (even) provided a suitable defense.


However, does this problem continue outside the Courtroom? As stated above, there is certainly an argument to be made that it does. A poor or minority individual is far more likely to encounter police or sheriff's officers simply due to demographics, or the density of population in their communities. But do police agencies specifically target poor and minority individuals, seeking to incarcerate, even eliminate these folks from (even) remaining in their communities?


If you believe media reports, the answer is a resounding, "yes." According to most reports, police officers have as a rule decided to "shoot and ask questions later." It really doesn't matter if, in these same reports, they ignore statistics showing otherwise, or even at times backtracking (indicating that there is no statistical significance to the claims they are making)...once they have "thrown it against the wall, it's pretty much stuck."


And many who believe it is a systemic problem acknowledge that little can be done to change it; that, the police must regain the public's trust (they never say how except to simply stop shooting people). Still, whether you believe it is systemic or a rarity, we can all agree that even one bad shooting, like the recent incident where an officer shot Walter Scott in the back FOR NO REASON...is one too many. For that reason alone, something must be done.


I therefore call for the immediate federalization of ALL police agencies in the United States. There are many reasons for doing this aside from the recent developments. There are municipal codes, state laws, federal statutes...there are laws in some states and not others...there are County Jails, State Prisons, Federal Institutions, multiple levels of Justice Courts, Appellate Courts, even Supreme Courts. It's way past time to consolidate them. Police agencies are no exception...only one problem. What if a Republican (ever) gets elected president again?
















This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]